Jorda on: The Criticality of Trade Secrets in Technology Licensing and Tech Transfer

| 0 TrackBacks
[A]nent the criticality of Trade Secrets in technology licensing (also in franchising), let’s be mindful that over 80% of technology licenses cover Trade Secrets or are hybrid licenses covering Patents and Trade Secrets. Furthermore, it is indisputable that licenses under Patents without access to the associated or collateral know-how are often insufficient to practice the patented technology commercially. A patent specification is often too brief and too general and discloses only embryonic or rudimentary R&D results rather than the ultimate scaled-up commercial embodiment.
I have authoritative quotations from experts about the overarching role of Trade Secrets in technology licensing. For starters, let me recite just one from Mel Jager.
“Trade Secrets are a component of almost every technology license … (and) can increase the value of a license up to three times to ten times the value of the deal if no Trade Secrets are involved.”
Thus, as a licensor you would leave money on the table, if you did not include Trade Secrets in the transaction.
Karl Jorda

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://porter.law.unh.edu/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/153

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Jon Cavicchi published on September 28, 2007 8:01 PM.

No trade secret : Jorda in the Hall of Fame was the previous entry in this blog.

Jorda on : Definition of a Trade Secret is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.